Your Memberships & Subscriptions

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
An Essay on Typography (Penguin Modern Classics) Kindle Edition
Eric Gill's opinionated manifesto on typography argues that 'a good piece of lettering is as beautiful a thing to see as any sculpture or painted picture'. This essay explores the place of typography in culture and is also a moral treatise celebrating the role of craftsmanship in an industrial age. Gill, a sculptor, engraver, printmaker and creator of many classic typefaces that can be seen around us today, fused art, history and polemic in a visionary work which has been hugely influential on modern graphic design.
'Written with clarity, humility and a touch of humour . . . timeless and absorbing' Paul Rand, The New York Times
'His lettering was clear, confident and hugely influential on the development of modern type design. The world has now caught up with Gill' Guardian
How do we see the world around us? This is one of a number of pivotal works by creative thinkers like John Berger and Susan Sontag whose writings on art, design and the media have changed our vision for ever.
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherPenguin
- Publication dateNovember 7, 2013
- File size2109 KB
Customers who bought this item also bought
Editorial Reviews
Review
[A] classic work...[Gill] is authoritative. --The Independent
It is the form of this copy, its extreme simplicity, its unique ordinariness, that makes it an inspiration. --Mark Thomson, Eye Magazine
About the Author
Product details
- ASIN : B00G0ICUD6
- Publisher : Penguin; UK ed. edition (November 7, 2013)
- Publication date : November 7, 2013
- Language : English
- File size : 2109 KB
- Text-to-Speech : Enabled
- Screen Reader : Supported
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Not Enabled
- Word Wise : Not Enabled
- Sticky notes : On Kindle Scribe
- Print length : 140 pages
- Best Sellers Rank: #2,045,468 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- #171 in Typography (Kindle Store)
- #1,086 in Typography (Books)
- #14,872 in Design & Decorative Arts
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
I read this the first time about 20 years ago, and then gave it away, and recently purchased another copy. I have frequently remembered what I took from Eric Gill: the idea of doing everything with the intent of doing it well, and that the frame of the picture (or the typeface of the document, or a careful paint job in a room) --the shape of the communication -- can be as important as the communication itself.
Half of the book discusses the changes in customers' and artists' psychology after the industrial revolution.
As the title suggests, "An Essay on Typography" (first published in 1931) discusses typography. Gill's credentials as a type-designer include the still-popular Gill Sans and Perpetua typefaces. The book itself is set in his Joanna face. I found it quite enjoyable to read. The pages are typeset according to his suggestions (in the chapters "The Procrustean Bed" and "The Book") for page layout: even spacing between words, 10-12 words per line, sufficient line space. The bottom margin is larger than the others, as he recommends, for ease of holding the book. Unfortunately I never hold a book at the bottom (when using one hand I hold it at the top; with two, at the sides). For the most part his notions of good type design and page layout are the same as you hear web designers periodically proclaiming today.
There is a chapter on lettering, giving a very brief history of the roman alphabet. And the next chapter is on the three alphabets in use by printers: uppercase, lowercase, and italics.
I would argue that the main theme of the book is not typography, however, but rather on the conflict between assembly-line style industrialism and the art of handicrafts at the beginning of the 20th century. Gill tries to make the case that industrial manufacturing methods and the methods of the craftsman fulfill completely different roles in society, and so are not actually in conflict. Both have their place.
He is concerned, however, that each method should stick to its own proper idea of aesthetics. Industry is good at mass producing things inexpensively using machines (and humans who are treated like machines). These mass produced goods should not try to imitate handicrafts, because mass-produced fanciful flourishes end up looking and feeling fake. Commercial posters attempting to shout each other down have turned to heavier (bolder) fonts, and have ruined legibility. Likewise with flyers using a jumble of typefaces to attract attention.
He is finally able to clearly express his concept of the complete separation between industrialism and handicrafts by the later chapters. For example from the chapter on "The Instrument":
"The time has come when the handicraftsman should cease altogether either to rail at him [the industrialist] or envy him. Let each go his own road."
And the roles of each:
"The industrialist makes no claim to produce works of art; he does so nevertheless -- when he is not imitating the art works of the past. The artist makes no claim to serve his fellow men; nevertheless he does so -- when he is not wholly led astray by the notion that art is self-expression of the expression of emotion."
Also in the chapter on "The Book," after discussing some economic considerations of publishing, Gill concludes:
"Whether, as seems probable, industrialism win a complete victory, or human nature so far reassert itself as to overthrow industrialism, is not here our concern. For the present we hold simply to the conviction that the two principles and the two worlds can exist side by side [...]"
As a stenography enthusiast the last chapter, "But Why Lettering?", was a very pleasant surprise. Gill points out the lack of consistency between the sounds of spoken English and the roman letters used to represent them. As a solution he advocates the roman alphabet be replaced by a phonographic alphabet like those used in shorthand systems! He devotes several pages to anticipating the charge that shorthand is ugly. This leads me to believe he was only familiar with the Pittman system and had not seen the cursive Gregg system which was dominant in America at the time. He rightly points out that current shorthand systems sacrifice legibility for speed, whereas a system designed to replace the alphabet for everyday writing would have to be completely unambiguous (everyday writing doesn't require real time transcription, anyway).
The last chapter also has a cute bit where he uses Adam Smith's example of the specialization required to manufacture a pin to conclude that capitalism is the most cooperative system ever developed.
Gill uses typography and printing as the vehicle for his social thoughts, and offers a good bit of advice on typography throughout. He discusses letter forms as ethetic, practical, and historical objects - especially interesting from a man who made so much typographic history himself.
I never did quite work my way through all of his social arguments, however. He seems to hold "engineers" as the opponents of art and perhaps creativity. I known that many engineers then and now lack training in esthetics and visual presentation. Anyone who's seen the Brooklyn Bridge or Eiffel Tower knows, however, that engineering is also a creative act. Gill ridiculed the practice of one worker designing a font, a second preparing it for transfer to metal, another cutting the master tools for each letter, and so on. I have to agree, the assembly line mentality is not suited to all tasks, especially when each product is as unique as a letter form. Still, among all arts, printing is perhaps the one most typified by team effort and division of labor. It would be a very rare individual who could create a text worth reading, create the font in which it is presented, set the type and run the press, and carry out all the other tasks needed to create a bound book. The question is not whether parts of a job should be handed to different specialists, but which jobs should be subdivided - a question I never saw answered.
This is a wonderful work by a man whose livelihood, art, and spiritual life all worked closely together. I recommend it to anyone who works in the arts, not just those with an interest in type.
Is get in, in the mind of Eric Gill, know more for him, and the world of this time.
Top reviews from other countries


This book provides very good insight on Eric gills views on typography.
I found it very helpful as some views are not popular giving the reader the opportunity of hearing a different perspective. Many books within this genre are a rehashing of each other, they often contain the same information however it is just laid out in a different manner. This book on the other hand was refreshing.
Not only that but Gill's writing style is very easy to read, so it is a very different experience from say reading the elements of typographic style.


Das Thema "Typographie" scheint nur am Rande eine Bedeutung zu besitzen. Neue Erkenntnisse ergeben sich jedenfalls nicht, zudem sind jene spärlich eingesäten Axiome doch in H.P. Willbergs "Typolemik" so viel gezielter und amüsanter zu finden.
Auf dem Cover steht "Written with clarity, humility and a touch of humour ... timeless and absorbing". Leider kann ich davon nichts bestätigen, oder aber Paul Rand hatte ein anderes Buch vor sich liegen.
